Search
In an era where investment strategies grow ever more specialized, the ability to measure relative performance using generic benchmarks is no longer sufficient. Institutional investors, fund managers, and stakeholders now demand precision and context that traditional comparisons cannot deliver. Customized peer group benchmarking has emerged as a critical innovation, allowing organizations to tailor their performance assessments to more granular, relevant comparisons aligned with their unique portfolios.
By moving beyond one-size-fits-all metrics, investors gain clearer insight into how their assets truly stack up against a handpicked selection of peers. This article explores the evolution of customized peer groups, their technical underpinnings, industry adoption—especially within GRESB—and the strategic value they bring to modern benchmarking.
The demand for benchmarks tailored to specific strategies, locations, asset types, or sustainability objectives has surged in recent years. No longer content with broad market averages, investors seek actionable insights that drive strategic decision-making and support regulatory compliance. As portfolios diversify across geographies and sectors, the need for flexible tools that ensure apples-to-apples comparisons has become paramount.
This shift reflects a broader trend toward data-driven stewardship and transparency, where clarity of performance fosters trust between fund managers and limited partners. Customized peer group benchmarking answers this call, offering the precision required in complex, multi-dimensional markets.
Custom peer groups are sets of entities or funds grouped by user-specified criteria rather than rigid, predefined filters. Instead of relying solely on system-defined segments, investors can define peer sets based on the attributes most relevant to their mandates.
The rationale for customization rests on two pillars: alignment and relevance. By tailoring benchmarks to mirror their own asset characteristics, investors avoid distortions that arise when comparing vastly different entities.
Following a pilot in 2023, GRESB—an ESG benchmark leader for real estate—fully rolled out custom peer groups in 2024. During its first full cycle, over 40% of participants used the custom peer group feature, signaling strong market appetite. By 2025, enhancements to the user interface further accelerated adoption, introducing flexible modification and greater transparency around asset type, geography, and sector.
Beyond real estate, financial and credit union analyses have long leveraged custom groups to refine credit and investment benchmarks. Academic research debates whether peer-focused benchmarks spur higher effort and performance—in mutual fund management, for instance—highlighting an aspirational effect when managers compete against a more meaningful reference set.
The technical backbone of customized benchmarking combines robust filtering logic with user-friendly interfaces. Key functionalities include:
Within a designated confirmation window—typically August 1 615 for GRESB users—participants refine their peer sets in an online portal. Dual rankings then present both system-defined and custom benchmarks side by side, offering continuity with legacy data while highlighting new, tailored comparisons.
This dual approach ensures that traditional benchmarks remain intact for longitudinal studies, while customized groups provide context-specific insights for the current cycle.
Transparency remains a cornerstone of trust in benchmarking outputs. Public entities disclose the full names of all peer group constituents, fostering confidence in the benchmarking process. Private entities typically reveal only fund manager names unless they opt in for more detailed disclosures of individual component scores.
Such disclosure regimes strike a balance between openness and confidentiality, ensuring participants can verify the integrity of peer sets without compromising sensitive information.
When deployed effectively, customized peer groups yield a range of strategic advantages:
Performance accountability and strategic improvement become sharper as managers benchmark against peers that share similar risk-return profiles. The process fosters aspirational comparisons and targeted performance enhancements, motivating teams to focus on the metrics that matter most.
Additionally, dynamic benchmarking supports evolving investor expectations, allowing benchmarks to adapt as portfolios grow or pivot into new market segments. This capability strengthens long-term alignment with investor goals and underpins robust stewardship practices.
To prevent group sizes that are too small or dominated by a single manager, quantitative rules automatically broaden filters when thresholds aren’t met. This ensures statistical validity and preserves the integrity of comparisons.
Methodologically, constructing valid custom groups involves a combination of quantitative checks and user discretion. Rules enforce minimum cohort sizes and diversity criteria—ensuring no single entity wields undue influence over aggregate results. When a proposed group fails these checks, the system auto-expands filter parameters until a compliant set emerges.
During the customization window, users can iteratively refine their peer sets by adding, removing, or editing criteria. This hands-on approach balances precision with simplicity, allowing fund managers and analysts to tailor benchmarks without requiring specialist programming skills.
Since its testing phase in 2023, GRESB’s custom peer group feature has matured rapidly:
By 2025, enhancements such as transparent editing history and improved group characteristic reporting have streamlined the user experience, driving further adoption among asset managers and institutional investors.
Customized peer groups are rapidly becoming a central component of modern benchmarking practices. By combining flexibility, transparency, and strategic alignment, they offer a powerful complement to traditional, system-defined benchmarks.
Institutional best practice involves leveraging both predefined and custom peer sets—thus maintaining objectivity while unlocking deep, context-rich insights. As adoption rates climb and technology platforms evolve, custom peer group benchmarking will continue to drive better outcomes for fund performance, ESG integration, and investor communication.
References
