Logo
Home
>
Portfolio Strategies
>
The rebalancing mistake most investors don’t know they’re making

The rebalancing mistake most investors don’t know they’re making

08/02/2025
Bruno Anderson
The rebalancing mistake most investors don’t know they’re making

Rebalancing is a cornerstone of prudent portfolio management, yet many investors unknowingly erode their returns by committing a subtle but costly error. Understanding this hidden pitfall—and how to avoid it—can safeguard your long-term goals and deliver more consistent results.

In this article, we’ll explore the fundamentals of rebalancing, review common missteps, and reveal the underappreciated risk of predictability that costs institutional and retail investors billions each year. You’ll gain actionable strategies to rebalance thoughtfully, preserve wealth, and keep emotions out of the decision-making process.

What Is Portfolio Rebalancing?

At its core, rebalancing is the process of realigning the weights of a portfolio to maintain a targeted allocation. For example, if you start with 60% stocks and 40% bonds but a strong equity rally pushes your stock allocation to 80%, rebalancing involves selling equities or buying bonds to restore the intended 60/40 split.

This systematic approach enforces a disciplined "buy low, sell high" rhythm and helps ensure that your risk exposure remains aligned with your long-term objectives. Without it, portfolios can drift into unintended levels of volatility or conservatism.

Why Rebalancing Matters

Financial experts agree that periodic rebalancing is essential for:

  • Maintaining consistent risk exposure in line with original investment goals.
  • Limiting over-concentration in outperforming assets, which can amplify drawdowns.
  • Enforcing a disciplined approach to capturing gains and reallocating to underperformers.

When executed correctly, rebalancing can enhance risk-adjusted returns over time and protect against sudden market swings.

Common Rebalancing Mistakes

Before diving into the hidden mistake, let’s briefly review known pitfalls that every investor should avoid:

  • Neglecting to rebalance entirely, allowing allocations to drift far from targets and altering risk profiles without intention.
  • Adopting excessive trading and emotional churn through overly frequent rebalancing—monthly or quarterly trades can rack up fees and taxes.
  • Ignoring transaction costs and tax consequences when buying or selling appreciated assets, which can outweigh the benefits of small allocation adjustments.

The Underappreciated Mistake: Predictable Rebalancing

Recent research highlights a far less obvious problem: the predictability of rebalancing flows. When large institutional funds follow a known calendar or threshold-based schedule, professional traders front-running by market participants can siphon gains at their expense.

Here’s how it unfolds: A pension fund signals that it will rebalance to restore a 60/40 split at quarter-end. High-frequency trading firms detect these incoming orders, buy ahead of the pension’s purchases, then sell to the fund at slightly higher prices. This front-running behavior costs institutions billions annually.

How to Minimize Predictability Risk

Individual investors may not face the same scale of front-running, but the principles still apply. To rebalance without becoming predictable:

  • Vary the timing of trades—avoid a strict calendar like the first trading day of every month.
  • Break large rebalancing trades into smaller baskets executed over several days.
  • Use new cash contributions or dividends to adjust allocations, reducing the need for visible sell orders.

Finding the Right Rebalancing Frequency

Vanguard research suggests that annual rebalancing is optimal for most retail investors. This frequency balances:

  • Transaction costs: Limiting trades reduces brokerage fees and spreads.
  • Portfolio drift: Annual checks keep allocations within acceptable risk corridors.
  • Tax efficiency: Fewer realized gains result in lower capital gains tax liabilities.

Rebalancing too frequently leads to churning; too infrequently allows portfolios to stray dangerously far from targets. Annual reviews, with exceptions for significant market moves, tend to strike the best compromise for individual investors.

Guarding Against Emotional Decision-Making

Emotions—fear during downturns and greed in rallies—can derail even disciplined rebalancing plans. To maintain objectivity:

Create a written rebalancing policy that outlines specific triggers and procedures. This plan becomes your guide during volatile markets, helping you stick to strategy rather than react impulsively to headlines or short-term noise.

Practical Rebalancing Methods

To implement a thoughtful rebalancing routine:

  • Review allocations annually, or when any asset class deviates by more than a predetermined threshold (e.g., 5%).
  • Use new contributions to buy underweighted assets, reducing the need to sell winners.
  • Consider tax-advantaged accounts for active rebalancing to avoid triggering capital gains taxes in taxable accounts.

Summary Table: Common Rebalancing Mistakes

Conclusion: Rebalance Thoughtfully, Not Mechanically

Most investors know they must rebalance, but very few appreciate the hidden costs of predictability and emotional reactions. By adopting a disciplined annual review, varying trade execution, and leveraging new cash flows, you can restore your target allocations without tipping off savvy market participants.

Remember, the goal isn’t just to rebalance regularly—it’s to rebalance thoughtfully. Incorporate fees, tax implications, and potential front-running risks into your policy. With this approach, you’ll safeguard your long-term objectives and enhance the odds of achieving consistent, stress-tested returns.

Bruno Anderson

About the Author: Bruno Anderson

Bruno Anderson, 30 years old, is a writer at spokespub.com, specializing in personal finance and credit.